Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P's global score of 80.3. Google Pixel 2's design is newer and somewhat lighter, but also a little bit thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. Google Pixel 2 has a little faster CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little higher display pixels density, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a more MP back-facing camera.
The Google Nexus 6P and the Google Pixel 2 have really similar memory to store more games and applications, both have equal internal storage capacity. Google Nexus 6P counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 28 percent larger battery size.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.