Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is a bit better than LG V20's 77 score. The Google Nexus 6P design is just a little thinner than the LG V20, although it is just a little heavier and was released only 11 months before. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG V20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Google Nexus 6P has a little more vivid screen than LG V20. Both of them have a better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a same size screen and an equal 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. LG V20 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V20 and Google Nexus 6P count with similar cameras, because although the LG V20 has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Google Nexus 6P has a bit superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG V20, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.