Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, with an 83.7 score against 80.3. The LG V50 ThinQ design is way newer, but thicker and just a little heavier than Google Nexus 6P. The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a little bit larger display and a little bit better display density.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture to take better low light photos.
LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little better battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.