Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. Even though Google Nexus 6P is notably older than the Moto G Stylus, it's construction is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto G Stylus's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Google Nexus 6P, and although the Moto G Stylus has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto G Stylus has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a little better battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments, a way more mega pixels camera and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.