Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Google Nexus 6P's construction has the same thickness than Moto Z4, but it's just a bit heavier. Google Nexus 6P has a slightly better display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Moto Z4 features a processing unit that's just as good as the Google Nexus 6P one, and although the Moto Z4 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Moto Z4 has a superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto Z4 also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto Z4 has a little better battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs more than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Moto Z4, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.