Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-11-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6P, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 80.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A32 is noticeably newer than Google Nexus 6P, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Google Nexus 6P features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher display pixel density and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a processor that is just as good as the Google Nexus 6P one, and although the Galaxy A32 has more RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A32 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations and a lot more mega pixels camera. Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.