Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Although the Google Nexus 6P is a lot older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Google Nexus 6P features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a quite inferior pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much bigger display and a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot better video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments and a way larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Google Nexus 6P is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.