Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. The Google Nexus 6P is an extremely older device than vivo X60 Pro, but Google made it a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P has just a bit better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel amount per display inch. Vivo X60 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a way more megapixels back facing camera, better video frame rate and a larger aperture.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with better battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.