Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, having a global score of 85.5 against 80.3. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a notably newer cellphone than the Google Nexus 6P, but it's a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Nexus 6P has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures clearer videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP, a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.