Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 6.0 | -- |
| 2015-09-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 760.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.37 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P, having a overall score of 82 against 79.6. The iPhone XR is a notably newer cellphone than the Google Nexus 6P, although it's thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Google Nexus 6P has a much better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much greater pixel density.
The iPhone XR counts with a really superior hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XR also has a larger number of cores and a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone XR has just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality and a camera in the back with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a superior storage for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Google Nexus 6P has a little better battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the iPhone XR is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.