Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 6.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-29 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 760.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6P's 79.6 general score. These phones have Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and Google Nexus 6P has Android 6.0 version. Although the LG G8X ThinQ is newer than the Google Nexus 6P, it's just a little heavier and thicker.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a quite superior performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Google Nexus 6P has a better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse video definition, a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality and a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images. LG G8X ThinQ counts with much more storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ has just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.