Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 2, with an 84.9 score against 81.6. Apple iPhone 11 Pro's construction is newer than Google Pixel 2's, although it's just a little thicker and extremely heavier. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a larger screen, a quite higher amount of pixels in each display inch and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436px resolution.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a superior processing power than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse video resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The Google Pixel 2 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3046mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.