Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-03-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has a score of 86.6, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 2's general score of 81.6. The iPhone SE (2022) construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also a little heavier than the Google Pixel 2. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a superior performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less processing cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better looking screen than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 1920, a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bigger display. Google Pixel 2 has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with better battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity. IPhone SE (2022) counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, although it has a lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a same size aperture.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.