Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, getting an 81.6 score against 77. Google Pixel 2's design has the same thickness than LG G7 Fit, but it is just a bit lighter. Google Pixel 2 has just a little better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The LG G7 Fit features a better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a bigger display and a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen. LG G7 Fit's camera is just as good as the Google Pixel 2 one, because although the LG G7 Fit has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos and a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
The LG G7 Fit counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 Fit counts with a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.