Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2's 81.6 overall score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 2, although it is way heavier and just a little thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a quite higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a bigger display and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ takes a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.