Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 81.6 score against 76.4. The Google Pixel 2 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and much thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, a better pixels count in each inch in the display and a little larger display.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 2 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.