Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a overall score of 81.6 against 81.2. Google Pixel 2 is a extremely lighter cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, but both of them are equally thin. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a way bigger display, a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a quite higher pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 2 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.