Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. The Google Pixel 2 is an notably older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but Google could make it somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto G Stylus features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations.
Moto G Stylus features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.