Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than Google Pixel 2, with a general score of 86.2 against 81.6. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body is incredibly newer than Google Pixel 2's, but it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto G200 5G features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of display. Motorola Moto G200 5G's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as the Google Pixel 2 one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G200 5G has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G200 5G has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.