Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Moto Z Force, getting an 81.6 score against 75.8. Although Google Pixel 2 is a little thicker than Moto Z Force, it's lighter and also newer. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little larger display, a little bit better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 has a bit better CPU than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel 2 also has a larger number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force has better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.