Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting an 81.6 score against 79.9. Even though the Google Pixel 2 is way older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's body is way lighter and just a little bit thinner. OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a quite greater pixels number in each inch of screen, a much larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.