Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Google Pixel 2, getting an 84.7 score against 81.6. Even though the Galaxy A32 is incredibly newer than Google Pixel 2, it's noticeably heavier and thicker. Google Pixel 2 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A32 features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2700mAh. The Galaxy A32 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.