Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 2, getting an 84.9 score against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Google Pixel 2. Galaxy A80's processing unit is just as good as the Google Pixel 2 one, and although the Galaxy A80 has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 2 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. The Google Pixel 2 and the Samsung Galaxy A80 have very similar memory to store more apps and games, they have the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A80 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 37 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.