Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a global score of 81.6 against 81. Even though Google Pixel 2 and the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro were released only 8 months apart, Google Pixel 2's design is somewhat thicker but way lighter than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 2 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 2 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.