Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having an 81.6 score against 78.8. The Google Pixel 2 is an a lot older and a bit thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, but Google managed to make it much lighter anyway. The vivo X60 Pro has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 has a bit sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a way more MP back facing camera.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.