Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than the LG Stylo 6, having a score of 80.7 against 76.7. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG Stylo 6, even though it was released just a bit further than a year before. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little faster CPU than LG Stylo 6. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. Google Pixel 3 XL has a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lower resolution camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.