Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's general score of 80.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a noticeably newer and a little lighter phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is just a little thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a sharper display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 26% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.