Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having a global score of 84.6 against 80.7. Although Motorola One 5G is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL, it's heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit sharper display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola One 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh. The Motorola One 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a larger aperture.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.