Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a overall score of 80.7 against 76.2. Although Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is lighter and thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater pixels density. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.