Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. The Google Pixel 3 XL is an notably older phone than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh. Galaxy A35 5G captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.