Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having a general score of 85.5 against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a a little bit lighter device than Google Pixel 3 XL, but they are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher pixel density. Galaxy A51 takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy A51 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy A51, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.