Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's 80.6 overall score. Even though Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, it's body is thinner and a little lighter. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's memory capacity for applications and games is very similar to the Google Pixel 3 XL one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.