Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Google Pixel 3's design has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it's lighter. The vivo X70 Pro has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better number of pixels in each inch in the screen. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a way bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.