Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 overall score. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, Google Pixel 4 XL is an older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro features greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 20% bigger battery size. The vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos, a much more megapixels camera in the back and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.