Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, with a general score of 81.9 against 78.3. The Google Pixel 4 design is somewhat lighter than the vivo X70 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker and was released 2 years before. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. The vivo X70 Pro has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.