Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-11-19 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a global score of 95.6, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's 87.5 general score. The iPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x operating system, and Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 14 Pro design is newer and just a little thinner than Google Pixel 4a 5G's, but it's also somewhat heavier.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a greater performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better display density and a quite better resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels.
The iPhone 14 Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back. IPhone 14 Pro features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Google Pixel 4a 5G, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features better battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.