Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting a score of 87.5 against 77. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is somewhat lighter but just a little bit thicker than the Honor 50 Pro, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Honor 50 Pro features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels, a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little bigger display. Honor 50 Pro features much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Honor 50 Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.