Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 83.4. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is an incredibly older phone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is lighter and just a bit thinner anyway.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.