Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is incredibly newer, but thicker and a little heavier than Moto Z Force.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Moto Z Force has a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Moto Z Force features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3885mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.