Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, getting an 87.5 score against 79.5. Even when the Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G were only released 6 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide identical operating system features.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor which gives a way lower image and video quality and a lot worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.