Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Just black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Even though Google Pixel 4a is older and a little bit thicker than the vivo X70 Pro, it's design is still notably lighter. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit better pixel count per inch of screen. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Vivo X70 Pro has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 42% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.