Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 5's overall score of 89. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro construction is newer and a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 5's, although it's a lot heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a little higher 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution, a little larger display and a just a bit higher pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a quite better hardware performance than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less processing cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Google Pixel 5 captures slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a higher 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 5 and the iPhone 13 Pro feature really similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with greater battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 5. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.