Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. Google Pixel 5's body is newer, somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the Motorola One Vision. Google Pixel 5 and Motorola One Vision both feature very similar screens, although the Motorola One Vision also has a bit better pixel density, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little bit bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola One Vision has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Google Pixel 5 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.