Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a score of 89 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 5 body is newer, a lot lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. The Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a little greater pixel count in each display inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a way better video quality and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features better battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 5 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.