Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G, with a overall score of 89 against 84.6. The Google Pixel 5 is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Galaxy A22 5G, even though both were released with only 8 months difference. Google Pixel 5 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A22 5G has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.