Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with an 89 score against 79.9. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 5 is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is a lot lighter and a bit thinner. The Google Pixel 5 features a very superior processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little larger display. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images or videos in low light situations, slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.