Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 89 against 79.4. Google Pixel 5's construction is just a little thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little worse display density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite larger display.
Galaxy A35 5G's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as Google Pixel 5's one, they have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A35 5G has better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A35 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.