Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | TFT |
| 430 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's general score of 76.9. The Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy On7 Prime, but both of them are equally thin. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit better display density and a little bit larger display. Google Pixel 5 has a superior camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a less MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low light situations, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 5 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.