Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than vivo X70 Pro, having a score of 89 against 78.3. The Google Pixel 5 construction has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it's lighter. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a little sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher display density. Vivo X70 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way better resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs.
The vivo X70 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 9% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.