Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2022-04-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, getting an 89 score against 78.7. Google Pixel 5's design is way lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just 18 months before. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal memory. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4650mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.